REPORTS from the White House assert that President Joe Biden has suffered only minor effects from his recent infection with Covid-19. However, as his recent, four-day trip to the Middle East proved, the hypocrisy and cynicism of his geopolitics is a much more serious and deep-rooted problem.
If his visits to Israel and Saudi Arabia proved anything it is that – despite the hopes invested in him when he replaced Donald Trump as president – Biden’s Middle East policy is one of business as usual. Speaking alongside the newly-installed prime minister of Israel Yair Lapid in Jerusalem, the president spoke of his “deep love and respect” for Israel.
The US president emphasised his country’s “iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security”. No such commitment was made to the security of the long-suffering Palestinian people, of course (and, in any case, as the Palestinians know to their cost, any such promise would have been about as bankable as a solemn oath from the lips of Boris Johnson).
Needless to say, Biden did not jeopardise the US-Israel love-in by mentioning the killing by the Israeli army of the Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh (a Palestinian-American who held US citizenship).
Instead, Biden boasted of the “record-setting agreement” that he – as then vice-president of the US – and President Barack Obama (above) made to grant Israel $38 billion in military assistance over 10 years. Those who harbour the fond notion that the US Democratic Party is somehow a progressive political force should note that Biden’s expression of unwavering support for the State of Israel is of a part with the party’s history of imperialistic foreign policy.
From the ludicrously lionised John F Kennedy’s warmongering in Vietnam and the Cuban Missile Crisis, to the killing of up to 807 people in Obama’s drone wars in countries as diverse as Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen (source: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism), the Democrats have always been as committed to the US’s expansionist militarism as has the Republican Party.
At the Jerusalem press conference, Biden was happy to endorse the “eloquent statement” by the Israeli Prime Minister. Lapid spoke from the long-established playbook of the Israeli political establishment.
Like his political forebears, Lapid made the cynical assertion that Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians is justified by the Nazi Holocaust of Europe’s Jews. “In order to protect freedom, sometimes force must be used,” he said, in reference to the continued sabre-rattling of Israel and the US over Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme.
Lapid referred to Israel’s enemies as “people who do not play by the rules”. This from the leader of a state that breaches international law on a daily basis through its occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights, and its illegal settlements on Palestinian land.
A state that, furthermore, refuses to acknowledge its arsenal of 90 nuclear warheads, situated in the Negev desert and trained on cities across Iran and the Arab world. Indeed, not only does Israel refuse to admit that it has such weapons, it has never allowed the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear facility at Dimona.
We only know about the nature and scale of Israel’s nuclear weapons programme thanks to the brave, Jewish Israeli whistleblower (and Amnesty International prisoner of conscience) Mordechai Vanunu. He spent 18 years in prison (11 of them in solitary confinement) after being drugged and kidnapped from Italy by the Israeli secret service Mossad in 1986.
Lapid equated Hamas’s occasional, largely ineffective military action against Israel with the Al Qaeda attacks on the US on September 11. This rhetoric – in which Israel is cast as the victim of Palestinian “terrorism”, rather than a highly-militarised Goliath towering over the Palestinian David – is entirely at odds with the assessment by Amnesty International, Nelson Mandela and the late Bishop Desmond Tutu (among many other campaigners for human rights) that Israel is an apartheid state.
Between 2008 and 2021, 5973 Palestinians died at the hands of forces of the Israeli state or armed settlers in the Occupied Territories (source: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). Of those, 1688 were children.
By comparison, the death toll of Israelis killed by Palestinian armed groups and civilians stands at 274, including 124 members of the Israeli armed forces, 76 settlers and 21 children.
By far the highest death toll (some 5246 people) has been among Palestinian people trapped by Israel in the Gaza Strip, the world’s biggest open prison. Gaza has been subject to repeated Israeli bombardment, most notoriously during former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cynically misnamed Operation Protective Edge in 2014, which took the lives of more than 2300 Palestinians.
Declaring Israel and the US to be part of the “free world”, Lapid praised Biden’s support for “an alliance of moderate countries that believes in peace” in the Middle East. The primary Arab state in that alliance is, he said, Saudi Arabia.
The cynicism of that statement is truly breathtaking. Indeed, it was equalled only by Biden’s hypocrisy when he departed Jerusalem for the Saudi city of Jeddah, where he famously fist-bumped Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).
As both Biden and Lapid know very well, there is nothing “peaceful” about a Saudi regime that rains down terror on the beleaguered people of Yemen on a daily basis. Nor can MBS, who is believed to be the chief orchestrator of the gruesome murder of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi (above), be defined as in any way a “moderate”.
A critic of the Saudi regime, Khashoggi (who worked for The Washington Post, among other news outlets) was murdered at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018. His body was then dismembered using a meat cutting machine.
Neither Turkish prosecutors nor the authors of an intelligence report for the US Government are in any doubt that Khashoggi’s killing was the work of the Saudi regime in Riyadh. During the 2019 campaign for the Democratic Party presidential nomination – in which Biden was up against resurgent socialist candidate Bernie Sanders – Biden sought to establish his progressive credentials by promising to ostracise Saudi Arabia.
Biden would, he told the American people, “make [the Saudi regime] pay the price” for Khashoggi’s murder, “and make them, in fact, the pariah that they are”. However, there’s many a slip betwixt a presidential hustings and the petrol pump.
US television host Stephen Colbert (above) got to the heart of the matter when he said that “the crown prince is, infamously – and I’m putting it delicately here – a murderer. But, on the other hand, gas is five bucks a gallon”. With the cost of living crisis threatening to contribute to a poor showing for the Democrats in the midterm elections in November, Biden is trying to persuade the Saudis to increase oil production.
In truth, it was Biden’s spasm of conscience back in 2019, rather than his meeting with MBS, that was the aberration. US administrations of both parties have long cultivated the alliance between Washington and Riyadh.
The appalling human rights record of the Saudi regime – a brutal, misogynistic theocracy founded on the fundamentalist interpretation of Sunni Islam known as Wahhabism – has carried far less weight with the US than has its role as a major oil producer. Equally, human rights have come a poor second to Saudi Arabia’s geopolitical role as an opponent of the Shia Muslim regime in Iran.
From the continued oppression of the Palestinians by Israel to the heartbreaking, eight-year war in Yemen (where the Saudis are in conflict with Iranian-backed Houthi forces), Biden’s visit to the Middle East signalled no change whatsoever. Like the Obama administration in which he served as vice-president, the Biden presidency has shattered the hopes of millions that it might, finally, bring about an ethical foreign policy in Washington DC.
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here
© 2001-2022. This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network. A Gannett Company. Newsquest Media Group Ltd, Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. HP10 9TY. Registered in England & Wales | 01676637 |
Data returned from the Piano 'meterActive/meterExpired' callback event.
As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles.
Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services.
These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community.
It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times.